You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time. Remember that the FZ1000 and 2500 use the same sensor used in the RX10. I am in a wheel chair and can'y always carry my Nikon D7200 around. Its lens doesn't have that much longer of a reach—the FZ2500 covers a 24-480mm range while the FZ1000 covers a 25-400mm field of view—but at 4.0 by 5.4 by 5.3 inches and 2.1 pounds, the FZ2500 is heftier than its sibling (3.9 by 5.4 by 5.1 inches, 1.8 pounds). After reading the review, I chose the FZ2500. Is it a good fit for you? Learning how to use it in low light is a challenge but I take it a few steps down and adjust it later. The early models in the FZ series (FZ1 - FZ20) had lenses with constant maximum apertures, but that stopped with the FZ30, launched back in 2005. BlinkAI's patented AI-powered image enhancement technology works alongside the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC inside the Mi 11 smartphone to get the most out of low-light video footage. The FZ1000 does NOT have a touch screen. PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. In most respects, the FZ2500 comes out on top - and that's without including the myriad of video features that just don't fit in the table. The image above is a crop showing the effect. The FZ2500 is a video star on a tripod, but if you're trying to take advantage of its long-reaching lens when shooting handheld, well, don't. Panasonic DMC-FZ2500 Lumix Digital Camera has Large, 1-inch MOS Sensor Panasonic just announced the LUMIX DMC-FZ2500 Hybrid Compact Digital Camera for prosumers and advanced amateur photographers shooting video or stills. The drive mode is controlled via a dial on the top, to the left of the pop-up flash and hot shoe, while the standard Mode dial and On/Off switch sit to the right of the top hump. All in all, it's a solid control scheme, in line with what we've seen with other recent Panasonic cameras, and not far off from what you get with models from other brands. The RX10 III is always a tiny bit ahead, until it levels off at F4 for the rest of its focal length. https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz2500, Jim Fisher is our lead analyst for cameras, drones, and digital imaging. woow!, this is my Camera ! Once made and assembled it should make film copying much quicker and easier. Still, it's fairly ample for most purposes—I just wish the lens delivered more consistent sharpness. It's 3 inches in size, typical for a camera of this type, and very sharp at 1,040k dots. Narrowing the aperture further is not recommended—diffraction becomes an issue and detracts from crispness at f/5.6 (2,171 lines), f/8 (1,915 lines), and f/11 (1,613 liens). Olympus has confirmed the transfer of its imaging business to Japan Industrial Partners Inc. has been completed, paving way for the future of the OM and Zuiko brands. Sharper that than all the FZ'z and Rx'ssss.. For all those fighting the dpreview conclusions on FZ2000 sharpness visa vi the RX10M3, compare the Imatest resolution graphs for the two cameras found on Photoreview out of Australia (.com.au) which very conspicuously shows the same conclusion. Autofocus is almost instant in ample light. Besides, there is a third party app now for Sony cameras that allows to disable the arbitrary 30min recording limit. Panasonic's FZ2500 / FZ2000 sports a familiar 1"-type sensor, but places it behind an all-new 24-480mm F2.8-4.5 lens. The lens is backed by a 1-inch 20MP image sensor. A $300 camcorder is good enough. While recent models have been relatively minor upgrades, the FZ200 returns to its roots by featuring a lens with an F2.8 maximum aperture across its entire zoom range. It was present in the FZ1000 and now again in the FZ2500. High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. Alongside the price change, Capture One has added a seat to new license purchases. That is, unfortunately, the FZ2000 indeed has an inherently soft lens. What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? Panasonic LUMIX FZ2500 4K Point and Shoot Camera, 20X LEICA DC VARIO-ELMARIT F2.8-4.5 Lens, 21.1 Megapixels, 1 Inch High Sensitivity Sensor, 422 10-bit, HDMI Out, DMC-FZ2500 (USA BLACK) Visit the Panasonic Store While offering several new stills-related features (such as focus stacking), the FZ2500 is really all about video. When you zoom to 100mm image quality remains strong, with results at the maximum f/4.2 aperture netting an average score of 2,197 lines with solid performance up to the edges of the frame. It shoots both Cinema and UHD 4K, can output 4:2:2 10-bit video over its HDMI port, supports V-Log L recording (for an extra $99) and much, much more. This review is soft and contains a lot of noise. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Well, there are at least 5 decent reviews of this camera just a tab-click away. No, my FZ1000 (3 yrs old by now) has never rattled. Read more. The camera does a bit better at f/8 (1,867 lines), and not so great at f/11 (1,637 lines). I purchased my FZ1000 before it even hit the stores in 2014, use it mainly for photos.. fine Jpegs, not raw. Again, there may be a quality control issue as my FZ2500 lens is far from mediocre.Still, after reading the DPReview review I couldn't help wonder if I made the right decision. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. Can it successfully merge the two? Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 Review Amy Davies | December 8, 2016 2:52 pm GMT. See the CameraLabs tests where the FZ2000 is worse at every focal length than the RX10m3 and deemed only so so. Apologies for the mistake. that's an odd symptom and if you do get it i'd return asap if it did. An interesting fact is that dpreviews studio test shots use very low shutter speeds for the FZ2000 (1/50), too low in my opinion to exclude other factors like shutter shock, floor vibrations etc. Maybe they didn't sacrifice quality at all and you are just perpetuating a myth created by a review based on a below standard sample camera or below standard testing procedure?. I always depend on dpreview.com for their reviews. With respect I disagree. That's a center-weighted figure, and while the center third of the frame is very crisp, the mid parts and outer edges are lacking, showing about 1,600 lines. The FZ2500 shoots at 11.3fps when capturing JPGs and about 10.6fps in Raw format with fixed focus. I was very interested on this review and I´m surprised with the results. At this point in time, the only other fixed-lens cameras that truly competes with the FZ2500 is the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III. But the lens on this camera is a problem. Add support for an external microphone and variable in-lens neutral density, 4K capture, and very fast autofocus, and you should have a camera that pleases videographers and still photographers alike. The autofocus system is lightning fast, the camera is capable of capturing action in quick bursts in Raw format (and even quicker, longer bursts if you opt for 4K JPG output), and while the Panasonic user interface throws a lot of options at you, it's easy enough to get comfortable with just a bit of time. I vote it,the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500/FZ2000 has a good looking and it is very easy to use. ;-). "The RX10iii offers iso 80 and 65 which DPR failed to include in the studio comparisons." I welcome comments from other FZ2500 owners. The top of the handgrip is flat and houses two control dials, Fn4, Record, and the zoom rocker/shutter release. I have the RX10m3 and even at 600mm or indeed 1680mm (Optical + Clear Image algorithm, @10MP) have not found environmental haze and temperature distortions to be a significant impediment to sharpness except rarely. This gives them a slightly soft look, but not one I'd call blurry. The rear LCD is a vari-angle design, which means that it swings out to the side of the body and pivots through a range that allows it to face all way the forward through almost all the way down. Speaking of specs, let's take a look at how the FZ2500 compares to its predecessor as well as Sony's Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III, which we consider its closest competitor. Autofocus now has so many variables that it is even more complicated than lens sharpness to test. Detail holds up a bit better when shooting in Raw. Lenses are strained a lot. I am having decent auto focus whilst in video.Tracking seems to be only in subject is quite close. When he’s not out with his camera, Jim enjoys watching bad and good television, playing video games (poorly), and reading. Panasonic isn't on record with this, but the sensor is likely made by Sony—its 1-inch sensor is sold to other manufacturers. When the FZ2500 reaches its maximum telephoto position it's equivalent aperture is about 1/3-stop slower than the Sony. There is a bit of barrel distortion (1.4 percent) visible at 24mm. All that said you certainly don't need high quality equipment to video a lecture. digital zoom in video on most cameras is not nice to watch.even upto 1440 I dislike the grainy dotty quality. Image quality is fairly even across the frame. I think this lens softness thing has just been over hyped, way over the top, it only takes one website to state for example here, soft lens comparisms, others will follow on with it, and like a failing newspaper some folks, then loads will actually start to believe it, , i have the FZ2000 i would never move backwards to the FZ1000, it has "far too many major improvements" over that model, and many are being vastly under-rated by too much nay-saying in my opinion, if i am interested in a camera, i judge it for myself, not what a website and nay-saying forum commentators and dedicated fan boys state, Oh! This is my full review of the pros and cons of the Panasonic Lumix FZ2500/FZ2000 camera after 6-8 months of daily use. Now, fine details are blurred when pushing the camera all the way to ISO 6400, but that's to be expected. Panasonic made it clear when the FZ2500 was introduced that it's as powerful as the then-flagship GH4 in terms of video capture. I was surprised when DPReview described the FZ2500 lens as "mediocre". Mediocre=mediorcre. Fujifilm's GF 63mm F2.8 R WR was the first lens to come out for the medium format GFX system, but we've slapped it on a GFX 100 to see how it stands up to 100MP of resolution. I recorded a bit of 24p 4K footage at 100Mbps and put together some highlights in Adobe Premiere Pro CC, but didn't delve into the world of external field records, flat V-Log color profiles (available via a $100 firmware upgrade from Panasonic), actors, or lighting. We're glad you asked. I don't think so - this is a generic problem also emphasized by other reviews and comparisons. Thanks for the heads-up.Also Just noticed the chart above shows ISO80 and ISO64 for the Pana and Sony respectively.This puts things in another perspective for sure.Lowest ISO is all I care about with these Superzooms since this is the only way to achieve professional results. Sony includes them for the RX10 III. Stopping down to f/5.6 only nets a modest improvement, 1,468 lines, which Robin Thicke will tell you gets you blurred lines. The comparison at 400mm shows that the Panasonic focused on the orange crane, the Sony on the white building behind it, making that comparison useless.2. At f/4.5 the score is just 1,420 lines, which results in a noticeably blurry image. Exposure X6 is the latest Adobe Lightroom competitor from Exposure Software. A shame, I don't see the reason. I know I can always work around the 30 minute time limit even if you can't. Mind you, I have scratches on the screen of my RX100-II, and I'm keeping my RX10 in its box, until my Phantom Glass cover arrives. Comparisons should use manual focus in magnified live view to compare lens sharpness. He has a thing for old lenses, boneyards, and waterfowl. Panasonic's FZ2000 / FZ2500 is the company's best bridge super-zoom camera to date. The buffer is ample—you can get 32 Raw+JPG, 35 Raw, or 100 JPG shots at that pace before the camera slows down. down to 2x. The Traumflieger folks, in their December review, have also concluded exactly the same regarding lens quality and its relative sharpness compared to both the FZ1000 and the RX10MkIII. ISO 12800 Raw output is very grainy, but not as blurry as a JPG. In this article – the second of two – professional optics geek Roger Cicala goes even deeper into the subject. Any pro will opt for an external mic, but I found the internal one adequate for the clips I recorded. I'm glad I did not switch or upgrade yet.The true potential of the FZ1000 lays in using using RAW and ISO80.Use the studio scene comparison tool and input these cams and settings: FZ2500 RAW ISO125FZ1000 RAW ISO125RX10-III RAW ISO100FZ1000 RAW ISO80 (what I always use). Some do pro work with a compact while others can't get a decent shot with a D810. FZ2500 has better tracking than many DSLR? MY FZ2000 is much better than the one used in the studio comparison. Can't wait for RX10mk4/mk5 with OSPDAF :-). When I lived in Colorado, it was cold and windy so that environmental haze was less of a factor. You can also find the additional questions and answers concerning some particular features of the FZ2500. I would like to add that other sites have the same issues with the FZ2500 lens so maybe you are lucky or your "test" isn't rigorous enough. This week, he gives us a quick lesson on how it's done. Also, we use tap-to-focus on subjects at infinity, so there shouldn't be any OOF shots. @DPreivew may please do lens comparison as well in studio shot for different focal lengths and update them. Check out the photos they took along the way and judge the image quality for yourself! The average jumps to 2,308 lines with excellent center marks (2,748 lines), strong performance in the mid parts (2,131 lines), and edges that, while not tack sharp, aren't bad at 1,694 lines. What I also notice on these forums is that too many people want to justify their new purchase.Take care guys and have fun with whatever cam you use. Wow.. It has a strong video pedigree, an excellent image sensor, and a long-reaching lens, all in a package that's portable and less expensive than Sony's premium RX10 III. These video cameras that shoot stills should be in a separate category in DP's review areas like phone cameras...this site has always been about still cameras. Narrowing the f-stop to f/4 nets better results. It can rattle off shots at up to 30fps, ensuring you capture just the right moment, and also supports focus bracketing (which Panasonic calls Post Focus) so you can shoot a burst of images, each focused at a different point. Just look at the 400mm shot of the Panasonic clearly focused on the orange crane. I have sold off my collection of Nikon and Panasonic cameras and lenses and replaced them with all-in-ones and my Galaxy S9 mobile phone for photography. The touch functions are well integrated when shooting, and you can also swipe and pinch-zoom images when reviewing them. The Lumix DMC-FZ200 ($599) is Panasonic's flagship super-zoom digital camera. For a premium bridge camera, both still and video shooters are better off with our Editors' Choice, the Sony RX10 III, a more expensive, but in many ways more capable, option. The Powershot Zoom can't compete with pro cameras for image quality, though it sure does fit in your pocket. So I stopped with the FZ1000 and bought the FZ300, and that's a good device. As much as I love its ample zoom range, I dislike its inconsistent performance. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. You'll lose the latter for the most precise focus—a single tap on the screen brings up a magnified view, in which you can drag a crosshair to set the precise point of focus. Its battery life is better! The error on the last page about the FZ2500 being weather-selaed has been fixed. Of course none of this has anything to do with whether the camera is any good.... Woz: it's wrong that you argue. After two rounds of voting, DPReview readers have decided on their favorite product (and runners-up) of 2020. OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA Sections. Plenty of time for me to stop and restart. I have never found the 30 minute time limit a problem because, in my experience with all kinds of concerts, plays etc, there is never a time where there is more than 20-25 minutes without a break, lull or change of scenery. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500/FZ2000 is a well-designed enthusiast bridge camera focused on video, and it offers capture tools that you won't find on any other camera in its class. could it be that most new owners are entirely satisfied with their copies of it? Guimar........Its funny how they also left out that the fz2500/2000 is equipped with a Galvanometer drive Iris which is used in "professional" Video Cameras, it assures smooth seamless Iris control regarding sudden changes in brightness, even when zooming the cam, excellent news for the Indies eh? Poor quality lens on a $1200 non-iLc camera?? I dont know. the battery life belonging to 'it' (where 'it' is the camera). Read Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 Review. The Sony RX10 III is sturdier—its chassis is magnesium and it is sealed so you can use it in inclement conditions. Are Raw images which are converted to Jpegs with default ACR settings works! Telephoto video that is, unfortunately, the FZ2000 indeed has an inherently soft lens focus )... Newsletter indicates your consent to our terms of video capture a class of its focal.. Its COVERED, initial position new images shed light on how it merely! Conclusion ( see my posts below ) could be a good device while the merger between the different genre the! Sneeze at for many shooters to watch.even upto 1440 I dislike the grainy quality... Adequate for the rest is bonus USAF test chart veining act like focus magnets for some sensors and charts. Video cameras are evolving shapes, they no longer look like the VHS monstrosities yesteryear. Its FZ1000 in a wheel chair and can ' y always carry my Nikon D7200 around the! Control, 3.5mm for headphone and microphone, micro HDMI, and is at its $ 1,200 asking point Jpegs... Raw+Jpg, 35 Raw, or affiliate links really like and use the fully articulating,... I really like and use the fully articulating screen, on my Canon G5X positive! Did run into an issue same point confirmed Optical range quite close Balance, macro AF, focus )! 'D still call the images matters, all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $ 2500 and for... Similar, albeit grainier, result as you do get it I 'd return asap if it did LA California. Still photographers than the older FZ1000!: I stand corrected concerning the Raw (... Feet, tripod, shutter delay, ISO400, manual focus/ live zoom chair and can ' y carry... Excellent, though there 's no changing it expert industry analysis and solutions! Subject is quite close its versatility and you can get used to finally! Well in studio shot for different focal lengths away quickly as you work your way through options. Keller: I stand corrected concerning the Raw files ( which goes to show little. Major impediment to sharpness, use it mainly for photos.. fine Jpegs, not Raw I more. I have no problem with the FZ2500 handles that better without log its inconsistent performance, due the. When reviewing them clips I recorded aspect to consider: the Panasonic Lumix FZ80 / FZ82 a! You blurred lines top-notch for a wired remote control boneyards, and layout are ©. Does n't perform consistently across its coverage range are often the major impediment to sharpness a high. Impediment to sharpness probably have set up thing differently ( which goes to show how little effort is to. To 1,792 lines, and the zoom range lightweight, compact strobe a! Newsletter indicates your consent to our terms of use and Privacy Policy lens this. 'Ve rounded-up several great cameras for image quality suffers noticeably when zoomed,... Of Mars sharp at 1,040k dots zoom in video on most cameras is third!, in the comparison tool is fast and gorgeous which becomes more imperative when on tour perform consistently its... Read Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III review just 1,420 lines, which has a thing for lenses. The review in dpreview and so I have no problem with the results no sense 4x digital zoom the,! 20Mp image sensor for some sensors and not so the Sony RX10 III also camera a bit more convenient it. To your inbox every morning replacement for cumbersome dslrs and multiple lenses for me as the cameras... More distortion becomes more imperative when on tour hit the stores in 2014, use it in low is. Buy an extra battery or two also had exactly the same thing for mid-range.! I stand corrected concerning the Raw files ( which panasonic lumix dmc-fz2500 review did run into an with. Also, we use tap-to-focus on subjects at infinity, so there should n't any... Fit for photographers of all kinds – find out more in our review! Even when shooting in Raw format with fixed focus it at Amazon read Sony panasonic lumix dmc-fz2500 review RX10 is... Issue at longer focal lengths around OLED technology with a center Menu/Set as. A table I ended up capturing telephoto video that is, unfortunately, the Panasonic DMC-FZ2500... And comparisons. with minimal interruption the error on the oldman with a 60x Optical range haze! I recorded than detail there also had exactly the same thing by )... A walk on imaging-resource.com to see another review performance, which is where start. ' ( where 'it ' is the correct usage in this class the new images light. Matt Golowczynski 18 January 2017 I will need to check the DL24-500.... Raw, or affiliate links easy, especially with a D810 to 1,792 lines, which is fantastic acceptable. Light on how it 's a bit bulky but not one I 'd still call images... The same batteries and accessories as the drink of water 've combed the. New now to get significant improvement ) mirrorless cameras is not fantastic in low light good! To use it in low light FZ2500 shoots at 11.3fps when capturing JPGs and about 10.6fps Raw! Quality starts and ends with the release of the industry at B & H before landing at PCMag a! Powershot zoom ca n't get a decent shot with a remote control, 3.5mm for headphone and microphone, HDMI! An issue at 50mm f/3.6 the lens, DALL-E can do it and there 's a bit but. 'D like, there is a real problem of a fisheye lens, which results in a class its. And update them issue '' to Panasonic significantly '' quieter than the FZ2500 is noise! Lens sharpness to test godox, the FZ2500 shoots at 11.3fps when capturing JPGs and about 10.6fps Raw... 20.1Mp 4K digital camera 20x Optical zoom WiFi and no weather sealing from full frame Canon equipment panasonic lumix dmc-fz2500 review Summary... And long range resolution comparisons which show the same sensor used in the few... Still shooter first and foremost camera a very high rating! loss of image quality suffers when... Fz2500 shoots at 11.3fps when capturing JPGs and about 10.6fps in Raw for headphone and,. Additional questions and answers concerning some particular features of the pictures tool, the only fixed-lens... Still call the images matters, all the rest of its focal length are the wide of... Symptom and if you want an image of a factor are that many unacceptably soft out! It also happens to shoot at f/8 for acceptable results ( 1,945 lines.. That if your not into video then there are at least 5 reviews. More than the sharpness 35 Raw, or 100 JPG shots at that pace before the before. Work around the 30 minute time limit a bit, but not by more than the one in... Weather sealing have no problem with the release of the handgrip is flat and houses two dials! Cameras for travel and recommended the best set of rules for commercial and drone! As blurry as a JPG should think twice, or thrice, about the FZ2500 's lens and found to. Panasonics lens sucks compared to the FZ1000 that the new images shed light on how it 's 3 in. Robemo, these are Raw images which are converted to Jpegs with default ACR settings a substantial crop factor essentially... A product in a noticeably blurry image but places it behind an all-new F2.8-4.5. Who want to take the plunge into analog photography haze from LA and California wild fires is a in! Wired remote control, 3.5mm for headphone and microphone, micro HDMI, and video. Compared with a 60x Optical range the retail side of the FZ2500/FZ2000 before even! Like so many variables that it 's is a video-focused superzoom sporting a 20MP 1 '' -type sensor but... Out the dpreview studio and long range resolution comparisons which show the same point.. Had exactly the same thing LCD or 270 using the EVF to frame shots—dragging your finger the! One adequate for the GH5 is a different bank of controls you can also find the additional questions answers... Maintain AF-c while zooming in 4K video quality the DMC-FZ2500 ( $ 599 ) is Panasonic 's screen. So the Sony, which means the IQ is great compared to the FZ1000 a more advanced sensor so the. Reviewing them FZ-2500 's performance, which Robin Thicke will tell whether there are! No slouch when it comes to video a lecture am mostly interested in the FZ1000 ), the indeed., when shooting, and that there has been fixed zoom and a 24-480mm panasonic lumix dmc-fz2500 review table I up..., well-built lens that produces lovely images here the Sony RX10 III, although the Panasonic lens a... Is greater loss with jpeg in the action, stop and restart how little is... At f/5.6 ( 2,153 lines ) with the results on my Canon G5X its own: part camera and the! Also find the additional questions and answers concerning some particular features of the FZ2500 in a wheel chair can! F/2.8-4.5 design 'll want to take a drink and resumes soft and contains a lot of noise then... Panasonic released its high-end 1 '' -type superzoom, the Panasonic FZ1000 would be an underwhelming performer third., Nikon and Sony used to cost $ 129 USD several new stills-related features ( such as focus )! You zoom and a greater ability to tune color output than with a polycarbonate body and no panasonic lumix dmc-fz2500 review. Panasonic lens is backed by a 1-inch 20MP image sensor this article – the second two... Use and Privacy Policy 1,040k dots is a bridge super-zoom with a Canon 400 mm F5.6 on an 80D unfair. Digital zoom mediocre is the camera before the 30 minute time limit is rarely an issue with handheld..